This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Dermatologic Disorders  • Patient Education/ Health Literacy  • Neoplasms  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Implications of Tanning Subtypes for Skin Cancer Prevention

Sherry L. Pagoto, PhD; Joel Hillhouse, PhD

Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(11):1505-1508.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Recently, the idea that UV risk behaviors can be characterized by subtypes defined by specific behavioral patterns has emerged in the skin cancer literature.^1-2 Further support is provided by O’Riordan et al³ in this issue of the Archives. They used latent class analyses to classify visitors to a Hawaiian beach into subtypes based on their degree of skin cancer risk, sun protection practices, and tanning motivations. The findings of this latest study parallel the study by Pagoto et al² of visitors to Lake Michigan beaches in Chicago, Illinois. In this study, 4 subtypes of beachgoers were identified, 3 of which were strikingly similar to the ones described by O’Riordan et al³: (1) low-risk sun worshippers, (2) moderate-risk sun worshippers (tan seekers), and (3) high-risk individuals who sunburn easily ("sunburners"). The largest subtype in both of these studies included individuals with a . . . [Full Text of this Article]

BEHAVIOR ECONOMICS: A THEORY OF ALTERNATIVES


MATCHING ALTERNATIVES TO SUBTYPES

MODEL OF INTERVENTION URGENCY

AUTHOR INFORMATION


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

A Day at the Beach While on Tropical Vacation: Sun Protection Practices in a High-Risk Setting for UV Radiation Exposure
David L. O’Riordan, Alana D. Steffen, Kevin B. Lunde, and Peter Gies
Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(11):1449-1455.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT